0xwilliamortiz
andrej-karpathy-skills
Behavioral guardrails for Claude Code, distilled from Andrej Karpathy's field notes on where LLMs go wrong when they write software.
Documentation snapshot
README 快照
本页保存的是公开项目资料快照,阅读过程不需要连接 GitHub。
Karpathy-Inspired Claude Code Guidelines
Andrej Karpathy named the specific ways LLMs screw up code. This repo turns each pitfall into a rule Claude Code actually follows — one CLAUDE.md, four principles, no silent mistakes.
Install
Option A: (recommended)
Quick install
Open fastsetup application and install necessary plugins in Claude
Then install the plugin:
/plugin install andrej-karpathy-skills@karpathy-skills
This installs the guidelines as a Claude Code plugin, making the skill available across all your projects.
Option B: CLAUDE.md (per-project)
New project: save the four principles below (see “The Four Principles in Detail”) as CLAUDE.md in your project root.
Existing project: append the four principles below to the end of your existing CLAUDE.md.
The Problems
From Andrej’s post:
“The models make wrong assumptions on your behalf and just run along with them without checking. They don’t manage their confusion, don’t seek clarifications, don’t surface inconsistencies, don’t present tradeoffs, don’t push back when they should.”
“They really like to overcomplicate code and APIs, bloat abstractions, don’t clean up dead code… implement a bloated construction over 1000 lines when 100 would do.”
“They still sometimes change/remove comments and code they don’t sufficiently understand as side effects, even if orthogonal to the task.”
The Four Principles in Detail
1. Think Before Coding
Don’t assume. Don’t hide confusion. Surface tradeoffs.
LLMs often pick an interpretation silently and run with it. This principle forces explicit reasoning:
- State assumptions explicitly — If uncertain, ask rather than guess
- Present multiple interpretations — Don’t pick silently when ambiguity exists
- Push back when warranted — If a simpler approach exists, say so
- Stop when confused — Name what’s unclear and ask for clarification
2. Simplicity First
Minimum code that solves the problem. Nothing speculative.
Combat the tendency toward overengineering:
- No features beyond what was asked
- No abstractions for single-use code
- No “flexibility” or “configurability” that wasn’t requested
- No error handling for impossible scenarios
- If 200 lines could be 50, rewrite it
The test: Would a senior engineer say this is overcomplicated? If yes, simplify.
3. Surgical Changes
Touch only what you must. Clean up only your own mess.
When editing existing code:
- Don’t “improve” adjacent code, comments, or formatting
- Don’t refactor things that aren’t broken
- Match existing style, even if you’d do it differently
- If you notice unrelated dead code, mention it — don’t delete it
When your changes create orphans:
- Remove imports/variables/functions that YOUR changes made unused
- Don’t remove pre-existing dead code unless asked
The test: Every changed line should trace directly to the user’s request.
4. Goal-Driven Execution
Define success criteria. Loop until verified.
Transform imperative tasks into verifiable goals:
| Instead of… | Transform to… |
|---|---|
| ”Add validation" | "Write tests for invalid inputs, then make them pass" |
| "Fix the bug" | "Write a test that reproduces it, then make it pass" |
| "Refactor X" | "Ensure tests pass before and after” |
For multi-step tasks, state a brief plan:
1. [Step] → verify: [check]
2. [Step] → verify: [check]
3. [Step] → verify: [check]
Strong success criteria let the LLM loop independently. Weak criteria (“make it work”) require constant clarification.
Using with Cursor
This repository includes a committed Cursor project rule (.cursor/rules/karpathy-guidelines.mdc) so the same guidelines apply when you open the project in Cursor. See CURSOR.md for setup and details.
Customization
Merge these with your existing CLAUDE.md. Add project-specific rules in a separate section below them, e.g. language conventions, testing requirements, or references to existing patterns in your codebase.
Tradeoff Note
Biased toward caution over speed. For trivial tasks (typo fixes, obvious one-liners), use judgment — not every change needs the full rigor. The goal is fewer costly mistakes on non-trivial work, not slower simple tasks.
License
MIT
Official distribution
获取与安装
暂未发现可确认的官方软件包地址
当前 README 快照没有出现 npm、PyPI、Crates.io、pub.dev 等官方包页链接。本站不会根据仓库名称猜测下载地址。
本站不托管项目文件;需要安装时,请以项目维护者发布的官方文档为准。
Before installing
使用前核验
本站保存公开资料用于阅读,不代表安全审计或功能背书。安装前请核对许可证、依赖来源和发布签名,不要直接运行来源不明的二进制文件或高权限脚本。